It took three years to join the bandwagon and read Kafka on the Shore. It took even longer to get started on Mr. Murakami. Apparently, he has been 'the-in-thing' for a while now. I discovered him around six months ago, and finally read his stuff four weeks ago (and finished Kafka on the Shore two days ago). Despite the fact that the book is very much sexually charged (which in turn has made me feel sexually depressed - not the best of feelings one can have), it was .. a good read. Here is my take on it (not that anyone cares post-hype).
When a book is translated (in this case from Japanese), you have to wonder how true to the original was the translation. Did the author really mean to be so crude when he referred to the protagonists' privates as his 'cock' or did he actually mean 'penis'. Structurally, there is a huge difference between the two words- the mood, the vibe changes quite dramatically depending on which word you choose. That's something I will never know unless I became fluent in Japanese and read the actual version. (In fact, the sibling is becoming fluent in Japanese, and I have a feeling that this is actually pushing out all the algebra out of her brain - it happens!).
Mr. Murakami is well-read and you don't need to Wikipedia to tell you that. Yes, I know everyone has heard of the Oedipus Complex and everyone has their own take on Freud and almost everyone is street-smart about their German Philosopher Nietzsche - which makes this book so wonderfully readable. Thanks largely to contemporary literature era it's alright to make constant references to other diverse (and sometimes pretentious) fields. Murakami tells us about his take on Bach, Beethoven, Schumann, the Greek tragedies - almost every page has his interpretation on .. something someone else has done and said. I Googled (Google has come so far that we've turned it into a verb - that is true accomplishment!) Murakami, and this is precisely why people (critics, general public) love him and why I'm a few inches short of loving him.
I have to admit it's a great literary tool, something I automatically do in my own .. dabble into words. I realise how pretentious I sound.
I've written nothing about the book so far and dare call this a review? This is where critics come in handy- they always have just the right words. To put it in plain words .. I've read very few books where the progression and 'unraveling' has been handled so delicately well. It would be wonderful (I assume) to make love to Kafka.. no, actually it would be wonderful to have him dream that he is making love to me (but we won't go into any details on how he rapes his sister in his dreams).
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

5 comments:
I'm not going to pretend that I'm not annoyed.
Please do not take yourself too seriously (or as someone of importance) and especially do not think that your views have swayed me in some miraculous way (however negative) as to me going to some extra length to actually insult you indirectly in my blog.
It was merely a back-handed comment not directed at anyone in particular (especially when Nietzsche has been appearing in such movies as History Boys and Little Miss Sunshine and is practically everywhere these days). Please do not mistake my randomness as a sign that I give one little hoot about how you play yourself out in front of me.
In a non-technical way of speaking, I am the last person who actually cares about what you or anyone else has to say or to prove. Nothing in my life (my views included) has ANYTHING to do with you and that is that.
Post a Comment